
What I like to do this time of year is take a look at how the conferences all did in the bowls. And since I live in Cincinnati in Big 10 country, I especially love to compare the results of the SEC to the Big 10. However, over the last 5 years, this comparison has been, well... rather boring. The Big 10 is in the middle of a run of underperforming years that is seriously starting to hurt their national perception as a quality conference.
Let's take a look at each conference's records:
Conference-by-conference 2008-2009 bowl record
Conference | Schools | Record | Percentage |
Pac-10 (5) | Ariz,Cal,Ore,OSU,USC | 5-0 | 1.000 |
SEC (8) | Ala,Fla,Ga,Ky,LSU,Miss,SCar,Vandy | 6-2 | .750 |
Big East (6) | Cin,Pitt,Rut,UConn,USF,WV | 4-2 | .667 |
C-USA (6) | EC,Hou,Mem,Rice,SMiss,Tulsa | 4-2 | .667 |
MWC (5) | AF,BYU,CSU,TCU,Utah | 3-2 | .600 |
Big 12 (7) | KU,Mizzou,Neb,OU,OSU,Tex,TT | 4-3 | .571 |
Independents (2) | Navy,Notre Dame | 1-1 | .500 |
Sun Belt (2) | Fla. Atlantic,Troy | 1-1 | .500 |
ACC (10) | BC,Clem,FSU,GT,Mary,Miami, NC,NCS,VT,WF | 4-6 | .400 |
WAC (5) | BSU,FresSt,Haw,LaTech,Nev | 1-4 | .200 |
Big Ten (7) | Iowa,MichSt,Minn,NWestrn,OSU,PSU,Wis | 1-6 | .143 |
MAC (5) | BallSt,Buff,CMich,NIU,WMich | 0-5 | .000 |


The Big 12 conference was proclaimed to be the best conference in the country by the media for the majority of the year, with 4 teams consistently in the Top 10 and putting up gaudy offensive numbers in the process. The conference gave us some of the best games (Texas-Oklahoma, Texas-Texas Tech, and Oklahoma-Oklahoma St. were all classics) of the season. However, after looking at their results in the bowls, you have to wonder if the pundits got it wrong all year...and we were just watching some decent teams playing in a conference that played WAC-style defense (ie. non-existent). The Big 12's top 4 teams went a 1-3 collectively in the post-season, with only Texas squeaking out a last second win against a mediocre Ohio State. Texas Tech and Oklahoma played great in the first half of their games, but were dominated in the second half of their games against SEC opponents. And Oklahoma State came up short against an underrated Oregon team.
The Big East continues to show that they are deserving of their BCS status, as they had a relatively good bowl season at 4-2. I think this conference will take advantage of the Big 10's perceived downslide, as more recruits will consider the up-and-coming Big East programs over Big 10 ones. Still not at the level of the SEC, Pac-10 and Big 12, the Big East is definitely on the rise in football.
The ACC had the most teams in bowls, but that's more a sign of that conference's mediocre parity this year than anything else. No huge results to distinguish the ACC this season... but the youth on Miami, Va Tech and FSU's teams next year will perhaps put the ACC onto the national stage next year.
The Big 10, with their storied programs and great recruiting base, will always be one of the best conferences in the nation on paper. However, on the field, they are living up to the 'big and slow' tag that folks have been giving them since Florida's trouncing of OSU two years ago. You cannot ignore the fact that their high-profile teams have not had good bowl showings in the last 3 years. Going 1-6 this year (and 0-6 in their last BCS bowl games) is very indicative that this conference just isn't as strong as it was a decade ago. Dare I say that the Big East may be a better conference top to bottom? Yikes?
Comments?
Leave 'em below...
No comments:
Post a Comment